Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT
Date: 2011-05-11 22:36:31
Message-ID: 201105112236.p4BMaVD05679@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Or you could just "unsetenv" instead of complaining.
>
> +1 for that.

OK, the attached patch does this, but allows PGCLIENTENCODING to be
passed in. The new output looks like:

Performing Consistency Checks
-----------------------------
ignoring libpq environment variable PGPORT
Checking old data directory (/u/pgsql.old/data) ok
Checking old bin directory (/u/pgsql.old/bin) ok
Checking new data directory (/u/pgsql/data) ok
Checking new bin directory (/u/pgsql/bin) ok

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/pgpatches/pg_upgrade text/x-diff 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2011-05-11 22:42:42 Re: performance-test farm
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-05-11 22:21:23 Re: performance-test farm