| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: Collation mega-cleanups |
| Date: | 2011-05-10 17:21:16 |
| Message-ID: | 201105101921.17850.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, May 10, 2011 07:08:23 PM Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:57:12PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Tom this collation stuff has seen more post-feature-commit cleanups
> > > than I think any patch I remember. Is there anything we can learn
> > > from this?
> >
> >
> >
> > How about "don't commit all the large patches at the end of the cycle"?
>
> My take home from following this is: 'Even Tom can get caught in the
> "just one more little change" trap'
I don't think any of the changes from Tom deserves that categorization.
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-05-10 17:22:20 | Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-05-10 17:15:33 | Re: the big picture for index-only scans |