Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Korry Douglas <korry(dot)douglas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Roy Hann <specially(at)processed(dot)almost(dot)meat>
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date: 2011-05-04 15:22:34
Message-ID: 201105040822.35165.adrian.klaver@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 8:19:33 am Korry Douglas wrote:
> >> When doing PR, it's more important to use terms people recognize than to
> >> use terms which are perfectly accurate. Nobody expects a news article
> >> to be perfectly accurate anyway.
> >>
> >> However, I posted this because I think that several folks in the
> >> community feel that this is going too far into the land of marketese,
> >> and I want to hash it out and get consensus before we start pitching
> >> 9.1 final.
> >
> > Call 'em table-valued variables.
>
> Ferrari Tables - everyone knows that a Ferrari is fast, would you expect
> them to be crash-safe?

Well actually, according to the below, not so fast:)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/formula_one/13282907.stm

>
>
> -- Korry

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-05-04 15:30:03 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Previous Message Korry Douglas 2011-05-04 15:19:33 Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-05-04 15:26:47 Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-04 15:19:54 Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes