Re: Feature proposal: distinguish each PostgreSQL instance in the event log

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature proposal: distinguish each PostgreSQL instance in the event log
Date: 2011-04-30 16:25:56
Message-ID: 201104301625.p3UGPuD05032@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Added to TODO list:

Allow multiple Postgres clusters running on the same machine to
distinguish themselves in the event log

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01297.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 03/22/2011 11:35 AM, MauMau wrote:
> > I'm sorry that I've mistakenly sent an empty mail. This is the
> > intended mail.
> >
> > "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote in message
> > news:4D889879(dot)3080705(at)dunslane(dot)net(dot)(dot)(dot)
> >>
> >> On 03/22/2011 08:22 AM, MauMau wrote:
> >>> I would appreciate your opinions and advice. I'll try making the patch
> >>> while I'm waiting for response. I would be very much pleased if I
> >>> could contribute to PostgreSQL and my proposal could be included in
> >>> 9.1.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's a good idea, but 9.1 has been closed for new features for some
> >> time. This would have to wait for 9.2 I believe.
> >>
> >> cheers
> >>
> >> andrew
> >>
> >
> > OK. I'll try to make a patch for 9.2, considering Tom's advice and
> > opinion. By that time, I will learn more about PostgreSQL design and
> > source code.
> >
> > I seem to have misunderstood the commit fest. I've re-read the
> > development info, and my corrected understanding related to the
> > development cycle is as follows:
> >
> > According to the following two pages, now is the commit fest 5. The
> > current commit fest will end on April 15. I would be grateful if you
> > could tell me where I can find out that 9.1 is closed for new features.
> >
> > PostgreSQL 9.1 Development Plan
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.1_Development_Plan
> >
> > CommitFest 2011-Next (Open)
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=10
>
>
> The last commitfest for this development cycle opened on January 15th,
> as shown in the first URL above, so that was the last date for
> submitting items for 9.1 Any items in the next commitfest are for 9.2,
> and that is the place to submit your item when you have a patch. There
> is no currently running commitfest.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-04-30 16:30:51 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update docs to say you need fsync to make sync rep work fast.
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-04-30 16:16:13 increasing collapse_limits?