Quick Links

Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance

From:	Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>
To:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance
Date:	2011-04-25 03:33:08
Message-ID:	20110425033308.GJ57793@csail.mit.edu
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:54:31AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Even though this didn't show any difference in Dan's performance
> tests, it seems like reasonable insurance against creating a new
> bottleneck in very high concurrency situations.
>
> Dan, do you have a patch for this, or should I create one?

Sure, patch is attached.

Dan

--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
ssi-fast-bailout.patch	text/x-diff	1.4 KB

In response to

Re: SSI non-serializalbe UPDATE performance (was: getting to beta) at 2011-04-23 13:54:31 from Kevin Grittner

Responses

Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance at 2011-04-25 13:52:53 from Robert Haas
Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance at 2011-04-27 17:26:52 from Simon Riggs

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Robert Haas	2011-04-25 07:14:16	Re: Unlogged tables, persistent kind
Previous Message	Daniel Farina	2011-04-25 02:06:06	Re: fsync reliability