Hi,
Op woensdag 20 april 2011, schreef Tom Lane:
> Actually, now that I think about it, 8.4 didn't allow on-the-fly
> reindexing of shared catalogs anyway. So that couldn't be your problem
> even if the test had shown the indexes didn't match the catalog. But
> it seems the rows actually disappeared from the catalog, and I have no
> idea what would've caused that.
ok, clear
should we even try to get them back by generating them somehow?
we're planning to upgrade to v9 in a month or so....
also: would there be any reason you can think of why using alter function in
the current version in order to correct this situation would have a negative
side-effect?
--
Best,
Frank.