From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgindent weirdness |
Date: | 2011-04-20 16:13:08 |
Message-ID: | 201104201613.p3KGD8u11946@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Now having said that, there seems to be a pgindent bug here too, in that
> >> it's throwing a space into
> >>
> >> Buffer
> >> RelationGetBufferForTuple(Relation relation, Size len,
> >> Buffer otherBuffer, int options,
> >> struct BulkInsertStateData * bistate)
> >>
> >> Whether BulkInsertStateData is flagged as a typedef or not, surely it
> >> ought to understand that "struct BulkInsertStateData" is a type name.
>
> > Uh, I think we have this listed as a known bug at the top of the
> > pgindent script:
>
> Hm. I guess the third observation is that in the current state of the
> code, there's no very good reason to be using "struct" in
> RelationGetBufferForTuple's prototype anyway, since the typedef is
> declared right above it. Maybe we should just change that and not
> risk fooling with pgindent.
Probably. :-(
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-20 16:21:49 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2011-04-20 16:12:00 | Re: pgbench \for or similar loop |