| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful |
| Date: | 2011-04-12 19:11:24 |
| Message-ID: | 201104122111.25457.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 09:00:40 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 08:09:53 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> 1. The existing names with a "C" appended (eg, OidFunctionCall2C) will
> >> take a collation argument (in particular, this replaces the existing
> >> DirectFunctionCall1WithCollation and DirectFunctionCall2WithCollation,
> >> which seem a bit verbosely named for my tastes).
> >
> > The first thing I though when I saw OidFunctionCall2C was Function Call
> > with C collation or such and that you wanted to rename all the existing
> > calls to that...
>
> Hm, well, you got a better idea? I definitely want it *short*, because
> these are going to be in a lot of places.
Not really. Maybe DirectFunctionCall1Coll or even DirectFCall1Coll...
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-12 19:41:54 | Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-04-12 19:00:40 | Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful |