From: | Achilleas Mantzios <achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Background fsck |
Date: | 2011-04-08 06:19:42 |
Message-ID: | 201104080919.43152.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Στις Friday 08 April 2011 08:55:51 ο/η Ireneusz Pluta έγραψε:
> Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
> >
> > In anyway, having FreeBSD to fsck, (background or not) should not happen. And the problem
> > becomes bigger when cheap SATA drives will cheat about their write cache being flushed to the disk.
> > So in the common case with cheap hardware, it is wise to have a UPS connected and being monitored
> > by the system.
> >
>
> It's not lack of UPS. Power issues are taken care of here. It's a buggy 3ware controller which hangs
> the machine ocassionally and the only way to have it come back is to power cycle, hard reset is not
> enough.
What has happened to me (as Greg mentioned) is that repeatedly interrupted background fscks (having the system
crash while background fsck was executing) might result in a seriously damaged fs.
Add to this, the possible overhead by rebuilding software raid (gmirror) at the same time,
and the situation becomes more complicated.
So its better to replace/fix/remove this buggy controller, before anything else.
>
>
--
Achilleas Mantzios
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-04-08 06:22:11 | Re: Background fsck |
Previous Message | Ireneusz Pluta | 2011-04-08 05:55:51 | Re: Background fsck |