Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable
Date: 2011-03-25 17:36:47
Message-ID: 20110325173647.GO4116@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Making DDL serializable is *not* simple, and half-baked hacks won't
> make that situation better ...

Sorry, that obviously didn't come across clearly (I think I've just been
talking to Kevin far too much).

I'm not interested in making them serializable. I'd like to not have
tables randomly appear during a serializable transaction.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Berkus 2011-03-25 17:53:04 Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2011-03-25 17:32:54 Proposal: q-gram GIN and GiST indexes