From: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address. |
Date: | 2011-03-24 16:07:40 |
Message-ID: | 20110324160739.GA1864@rice.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:00:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >> On 03/18/2011 09:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>> "all balls" seems like a colloquialism best avoided in our documentation.
>
> >> It's already there, although I agree it's infelicitous.
>
> > I vote for taking it out. I think that could be interpreted as inappropriate.
>
> IIRC, the pre-existing usage refers to time 00:00:00. It does not seem
> especially useful to adopt the same terminology for network addresses;
> that's more likely to confuse people than anything else.
>
And just as a historical etymological note for the list, in case anyone
finds this in the archives: "all balls" referring to all zeros setting
shows up as NASA speak in Apollo era transcripts, for any sort of "all
zeros" setting - the one I remember off hand was actually a angle
setting for an engine firing for Apollo 13. It may have been milspeak at
one time as well. The more modern interpretation seems to be a
contraction of "all balls, no brains", so would in fact be a little off
for a changelog entry.
Ross "etymologically yours" Reedstrom
--
Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D. reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu
Systems Engineer & Admin, Research Scientist phone: 713-348-6166
Connexions http://cnx.org fax: 713-348-3665
Rice University MS-375, Houston, TX 77005
GPG Key fingerprint = F023 82C8 9B0E 2CC6 0D8E F888 D3AE 810E 88F0 BEDE
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-03-24 18:34:29 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document the all-balls IPv6 address. |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-03-24 11:02:49 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Basic Recovery Control functions for use in Hot Standby. Pause, |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-03-24 17:32:10 | Re: really lazy vacuums? |
Previous Message | Joseph Conway | 2011-03-24 15:45:58 | Re: Re: making write location work (was: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication) |