Re: template0 database comment

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: template0 database comment
Date: 2011-03-12 16:57:04
Message-ID: 201103121657.p2CGv4U19657@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > OK, funny guys. ?;-) ?Can someone give me the right text. ?Obviously I
> > don' know what template0 is used for either. ?Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
> >
>
> template0: unmodifiable pristine empty database
> template1: default template for new databases

I think I like "unmodifiable empty database".

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-12 17:01:09 Re: template0 database comment
Previous Message Greg Stark 2011-03-12 16:13:19 Re: Fwd: index corruption in PG 8.3.13