From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Srini Raghavan <sixersrini(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Database file copy |
Date: | 2011-03-11 10:34:53 |
Message-ID: | 201103111034.p2BAYrt16340@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>
> >> shouldn't we be getting support for the new syntax added, so
> >> there can be a release or two supporting both?
> >
> > You mean like 9.0?
>
> Yeah, just like that.
>
> If we're going to be supporting that long term, we should probably
> change the note about FREEZE being deprecated, though.
>
> So, still +1 on removing the wording about FREEZE being deprecated,
> but instead we should mention what actually *is* deprecated (the
> omission of the parentheses).
Done with the attached, applied patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/vacuum.diff | text/x-diff | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-03-11 10:46:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-11 10:34:43 | pgsql: Document that the parenthesized VACUUM syntax is deprecated, not |