From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Reid(dot)Thompson(at)ateb(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24MI') |
Date: | 2011-02-25 15:02:57 |
Message-ID: | 201102251502.p1PF2vl17931@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver wrote:
> test=# select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24MI');
> to_timestamp
> ------------------------
> 2011-02-26 14:00:00-08
> (1 row)
>
> Corrected for the ':':
>
> test=# select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI');
> to_timestamp
> ------------------------
> 2011-02-26 14:50:00-08
> (1 row)
>
>
> On 9.0.3 corrected for the ':':
>
> test(5432)aklaver=>select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY
> HH24:MI');
> to_timestamp
> ------------------------
> 2011-02-26 14:50:00-08
> (1 row)
>
>
> Seems 9.0+ is stricter on its parsing.
Agreed. We have made some cleanups to the to_timestamp code in recent
major releases and that is what the user must be seeing.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | akp geek | 2011-02-25 15:42:18 | Re: select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24MI') |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-02-25 14:50:13 | Re: select to_timestamp('02/26/2011 14:50', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24MI') |