| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous standbys? |
| Date: | 2011-02-24 03:25:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20110224.122549.550118873833919206.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> there could be only one standby at the same time...
> in the original patch there could be several synchronous standby
> servers and the primary was going to wait until the first one of them
> to answer, but that was removed and replaced by a list of possible
> synch standby servers and the first that connects is the one the
> primary will wait for. because right now it's a simple list the first
> one will always be the synch standby until it's removed from the list
> or phisically.
>
> the other comment in the doc should be removed
Thanks for the info!
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-02-24 03:30:08 | Re: WIP: cross column correlation ... |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-24 03:14:47 | Re: Possible substitute for PostmasterIsAlive polling loops |