Re: Update PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0?
Date: 2011-02-21 03:08:17
Message-ID: 201102210308.p1L38Hg19165@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Can someone update the PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0?
> >>
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC
> >>
> >> Right now it says "Approximate shared memory bytes required (as of
> >> 8.3)".
>
> > This documentation still says as of 8.3. If they are unchanged, can I
> > just remove the version mention?
>
> Mentioning the version was intentional, so that people could gauge how
> obsolete the information might be. I certainly think it'd be
> inappropriate to remove that caution flag right now, when the SSI patch
> has likely blown those numbers all to heck.

OK, thanks. I was hoping that either the numbers are stable, or we are
always going to update them for every major release, but alas, seems
what we do now is the best option.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-02-21 03:59:12 Re: Void binary patch
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2011-02-21 02:03:25 contrib/unaccent regression test failed