Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )

Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> > In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in polymorphic functions),
> > where the function name is concat(): (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic SQL Functions).
> > Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name when concat goes into
> > core, as seems to be the plan.
> >
> > If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change that example
> > function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied.
> >
>
> My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached.
>
> Here is the correct one.

Applied for 9.1. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +