From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] pgbench to the MAXINT |
Date: | 2011-02-11 13:35:51 |
Message-ID: | 20110211133551.GE4116@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Greg,
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Poking around a bit more, I just discovered another possible approach is
> > to use erand48 instead of rand in pgbench, which is either provided by
> > the OS or emulated in src/port/erand48.c That's way more resolution
> > than needed here, given that 2^48 pgbench accounts would be a scale of
> > 2.8M, which makes for a database of about 42 petabytes.
>
> I think that might be a good idea --- it'd reduce the cross-platform
> variability of the results quite a bit, I suspect. random() is not
> to be trusted everywhere, but I think erand48 is pretty much the same
> wherever it exists at all (and src/port/ provides it elsewhere).
Works for me. Greg, will you be able to work on this change? If not, I
might be able to.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Banck | 2011-02-11 13:59:33 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-11 13:18:40 | Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre C | 2011-02-11 14:51:44 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |
Previous Message | Andrea Suisani | 2011-02-11 11:33:22 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |