| From: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: exposing COPY API |
| Date: | 2011-02-09 12:38:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20110209213853.7DFE.6989961C@metrosystems.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:49:36 -0500
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Shigeru HANADA
> <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > I'll submit revised file_fdw patch after removing IsForeignTable()
> > catalog lookup along Heikki's proposal.
>
> So I'm a bit confused. I don't see the actual copy API change patch
> anywhere here. Are we close to getting something committed there?
I'm sorry but I might have missed your point...
I replied here to answer to Itagaki-san's mention about typos in
file_fdw patch.
Or, would you mean that file_fdw should not depend on "copy API change"
patch?
Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-02-09 12:53:20 | Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1 |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2011-02-09 12:12:56 | Re: Transaction-scope advisory locks |