From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... |
Date: | 2011-02-04 22:58:17 |
Message-ID: | 201102042258.p14MwIV28696@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Greg Smith wrote:
> Check out
> http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=postgres%2C+mysql%2C+oracle&relative=1&relative=1
> if you want to see the real story here. Oracle has a large installed
> base, but it's considered a troublesome legacy product being replaced
+1 for Oracle being a "troublesome legacy product".
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-02-04 23:05:23 | Re: Linux filesystem performance and checkpoint sorting |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2011-02-04 22:53:15 | Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2011-02-04 23:15:10 | Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-02-04 22:57:59 | Re: Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements |