Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
Date: 2011-01-20 19:48:59
Message-ID: 20110120194859.GO30352@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> How much has that code been updated from one release to the next?

Just an FYI, I talked to depesz on IRC (please chime in if you disagree
with any of this) and he indicated that he's had to update the code
from time to time, mostly because the parser was too strict.

He also mentioned that he didn't feel it was terribly complicated or
that it'd be difficult to update for this. Looking over the code, it's
got a simple regex for matching that line which would have to be
updated, but I don't think it'd require much more than that.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-20 19:50:01 Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-01-20 19:22:24 Re: ALTER TYPE 1: recheck index-based constraints