Re: test_fsync label adjustments

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: test_fsync label adjustments
Date: 2011-01-18 23:03:24
Message-ID: 201101182303.p0IN3Ol08867@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I have modified test_fsync to use test labels that match wal_sync_method
> > values, and and added more tests for open_sync with different sizes.
>
> Given that it was unclear whether the first such test was of any value,
> why are you slowing down the program by adding more?

Greg Smith indicated it has value, so I made it more complete. No?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-01-18 23:05:07 Re: Fixing GIN for empty/null/full-scan cases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-18 22:59:56 Re: test_fsync label adjustments