Re: SSI patch version 12

From: Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI patch version 12
Date: 2011-01-18 01:26:11
Message-ID: 20110118012611.GL87714@csail.mit.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 07:20:20PM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> OK. I may need to bounce some questions off the list to resolve some
> of them. The biggest, in my mind, is whether MySerializableXact
> needs to be declared volatile. I don't have my head around the
> issues on that as well as I might. Any thoughts on it?

I'd been meaning to ask about that too. I couldn't think of any reason
it would need to be volatile. Why do you think it might need to be?

Dan

--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2011-01-18 01:29:13 Re: test_fsync open_sync test
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-01-18 01:26:09 Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums