From: | Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SSI patch version 12 |
Date: | 2011-01-18 01:26:11 |
Message-ID: | 20110118012611.GL87714@csail.mit.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 07:20:20PM -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> OK. I may need to bounce some questions off the list to resolve some
> of them. The biggest, in my mind, is whether MySerializableXact
> needs to be declared volatile. I don't have my head around the
> issues on that as well as I might. Any thoughts on it?
I'd been meaning to ask about that too. I couldn't think of any reason
it would need to be volatile. Why do you think it might need to be?
Dan
--
Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL http://drkp.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-01-18 01:29:13 | Re: test_fsync open_sync test |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-01-18 01:26:09 | Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums |