| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr |
| Cc: | magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming base backups |
| Date: | 2011-01-16 01:33:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20110116.103310.988620289277610687.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> When do the standby launch its walreceiver? It would be extra-nice for
> the base backup tool to optionally continue streaming WALs until the
> standby starts doing it itself, so that wal_keep_segments is really
> deprecated. No idea how feasible that is, though.
Good point. I have been always wondering why we can't use exiting WAL
transporting infrastructure for sending/receiving WAL archive
segments in streaming replication.
If my memory serves, Fujii has already proposed such an idea but was
rejected for some reason I don't understand.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2011-01-16 01:49:55 | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2 |
| Previous Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2011-01-16 01:26:24 | Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages |