> Review:
>
> The only possible point of concern I see here is the naming of the C
> identifier. Everything else in class 40 uses ERRCODE_T_R_whatever,
> with T_R standing for transaction rollback. It's not obvious to me
> that that convention has any real value, but perhaps we ought to
> follow it here for the sake of consistency?
Yeah. Actually at first I used "T_R" convention. After a few seconds
thought, I realized that "T_R" is not appropreate by the same reason
you feel. Possible other argument might be "Terminating connection
always involves transaction rollback. So using T_R is ok". I'm not
sure this argument is reasonable enough though.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp