| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Srini Raghavan <sixersrini(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Database file copy |
| Date: | 2011-01-14 20:11:29 |
| Message-ID: | 201101142011.p0EKBT812472@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> > Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> The reason for wanting to deprecate and ultimately remove that
> >> syntax is so we can get rid of FREEZE as a reserved word.
>
> > Oh, OK. I can go along with that. If we're going that route,
> > though, shouldn't we be getting support for the new syntax added, so
> > there can be a release or two supporting both?
>
> You mean like 9.0?
FYI, I just checked and pg_upgrade does not run the VACUUM command at
all, but vacuumdb, and vacuumdb knows to use parentheses when connecting
to a >= 9.0 server.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-01-14 20:16:54 | Re: LOCK for non-tables |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-14 20:05:52 | Re: LOCK for non-tables |