From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DISCARD ALL ; stored procedures |
Date: | 2011-01-07 15:49:26 |
Message-ID: | 20110107154926.GP4933@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Really it seems to me that changing the search path ought to discard
> anything that might have been done differently had the search path
> been different, but I don't think that's back-patch material.
I like that idea, but I agree it wouldn't be back-patchable, and I could
see arguments against it also (convoluting the GUC mechanics, etc).
> > Making it part of DISCARD PLANS; and back-patching it to 8.3 where
> > DISCARD was introduced would be awesome for me. :)
>
> I'd need to look at this more closely before committing anything, but
> at first blush I think that's reasonable. Have a patch?
Sadly, no.. To be honest, I was fully expecting a response of "that's
hard to do." I'm not sure we have any mechanics in place for throwing
away stored procedure plans, but I'll go look and see if I can come up
with something. Would *love* to get this fixed.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-01-07 15:52:51 | Re: LOCK for non-tables |
Previous Message | Garick Hamlin | 2011-01-07 15:47:46 | Re: Streaming base backups |