Re: does this mean i have a corruption?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Witney <awitney(at)sgul(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: tech(at)leatherlink(dot)net, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: does this mean i have a corruption?
Date: 2006-06-05 14:45:43
Message-ID: 20107.1149518743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adam Witney <awitney(at)sgul(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> I don't know, so posting your question to the list. I meant to ask last
> night in fact, should i be worried as to why this occurred?

Yeah, you should, but since you hadn't given us any context about the
problem I figured you only cared about a quick fix. Otherwise I would
have suggested saving a physical copy of the broken index and table
for analysis.

The symptoms imply that some of the index entries were pointing to rows
that didn't belong to them (ie, rows with a different bioassay_id value
than what the index entry said). The only ways I know of to explain
that involve database or system crashes ... you have any recently?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-06-05 14:52:10 Re: create view problem
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2006-06-05 13:49:22 Re: Best way to store and retrieve large objects in