"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I haven't looked at the code so I presume from that comment it's not
> as simple as I thought it might be, i.e. there isn't a loop somewhere
> constructing a tupleDesc where the isdropped flag can ge tested.
The problem is more that there are too many of 'em ... fixing the
problem retail doesn't seem attractive.
regards, tom lane