| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problems with ALTER DOMAIN patch |
| Date: | 2002-12-11 23:35:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20102.1039649754@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have an idea. Rather than doing some complex locking for types, why
> don't we just restrict ALTER DOMAIN to cases where we are the only one
> attached to the database, as seen in dropdb().
Yech!
> would allow the regression test to work too because no one is attached
> to 'regression' at the time of the test.
No, we'd just get random reports of unreproducible failures.
FWIW, I frequently attach to the regression database with a manual psql
while the regression tests are running. It's a useful thing to do ---
I've more than once found bugs that way.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-12-12 00:00:08 | Re: Problems with ALTER DOMAIN patch |
| Previous Message | Kevin Brown | 2002-12-11 23:30:47 | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |