From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TODO item for pg_ctl and server detection |
Date: | 2010-12-29 18:44:27 |
Message-ID: | 201012291844.oBTIiRe14875@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yes, that was my calculus too. I realized that we create session ids by
> merging the process id and backend start time, so I went ahead and added
> the postmaster start time epoch to the postmaster.pid file. While there
> is no way to pass back the postmaster start time from PQping, I added
> code to pg_ctl to make sure the time in the postmaster.pid file is not
> _before_ pg_ctl started running. We only check PQping() after we have
> started the postmaster ourselves, so it fits our needs.
Tom suggested that there might be clock skew between pg_ctl and the
postmaster, so I added a 2-second slop in checking the postmaster start
time. Tom also wanted the connection information to be output all at
once, but that causes a problem with detecting pre-9.1 servers so I
avoided it.
Updated patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/pgpatches/pg_ctl.diff | text/x-diff | 16.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-12-29 18:47:37 | Re: SSI memory mitigation & false positive degradation |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-29 18:42:04 | Re: pg_streamrecv for 9.1? |