* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> However, it'd be a real good idea for that role to be NOLOGIN if it's
> there by default.
Definitely. I'd also suggest we WARN if someone creates a situation
where a role has both replication and login, and maybe prevent it
altogether, it's just a bad idea..
Thanks,
Stephen