Re: [HACKERS] Improved JDBC driver part 2

On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:47:13PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 19:49, Radosław Smogura <mail(at)smogura(dot)eu> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Maybe you are interested about this what I done with JDBC
>
> <snip>
>
>
> > Driver is here http://www.rsmogura.net/pgsql/pgjdbc_exp_20101130_C.tar.gz is
> > currently JDK 6 compatible (will be not), compressed patch takes about 136kb
> > gziped.
>
> Is there any particular reason why this work can't be maintained as a
> branch to the main driver? My understanding is your work is based off
> that one? Being able to work like that would make things a lot easier
> to review.
>
> That said, such a process would also be a lot easier if the JDBC
> driver wasn't in cvs ;)

This brings up an excellent point. Would the people now developing
the JDBC driver object to switching to git?

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate