Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Pierre C <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BBU Cache vs. spindles
Date: 2010-12-01 13:48:01
Message-ID: 201012011348.oB1Dm1123786@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance pgsql-www

Pierre C wrote:
>
> > Is that true? I have no idea. I thought everything was done at the
> > 512-byte block level.
>
> Newer disks (2TB and up) can have 4k sectors, but this still means a page
> spans several sectors.

Yes, I had heard about that.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2010-12-01 16:34:04 Re: SELECT INTO large FKyed table is slow
Previous Message pasman pasmański 2010-12-01 11:38:21 Re: tidscan not work ? Pg 8.4.5 + WinXP

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-12-01 23:28:46 Re: missing manual
Previous Message Tjibbe 2010-12-01 11:13:39 missing manual