Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?

From: Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Eric Davies <eric(at)barrodale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?
Date: 2010-11-24 09:58:46
Message-ID: 20101124185845.96E2.6989961C@metrosystems.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:22:02 -0800
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 20:18 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > On 23.11.2010 14:22, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
>
> > > OID is supported to get oid from the source table (yes, it works only
> > > for postgresql_fdw but it seems useful to support).
> >
> > I don't think that's worthwhile. Oids on user tables is a legacy
> > feature, not recommended for new applications.
>
> Agreed. We should do everything we can to NOT encourage their use.

Agreed. I'll remove OIDs support and repost the patch in new thread.

Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-11-24 10:48:25 Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-11-24 07:46:09 Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array