From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: duplicate connection failure messages |
Date: | 2010-11-20 23:07:56 |
Message-ID: | 201011202307.oAKN7vl13470@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I assume you are suggesting to use our inet_net_ntop() even if the
> > system has inet_ntop().
>
> If you're going to have code to do the former, it doesn't seem to be
> worth the trouble to also have code that does the latter ...
OK, we will not call inet_ntop() at all. I moved the CIDR part of
adt/inet_net_ntop.c into adt/inet_cidr_ntop.c, and moved the remaining
"net" part to /port/inet_net_ntop.c.
I then changed all uses of inet_ntoa to use inet_net_ntop(). While this
churn would perhaps not be warranted just to allow for better error
messages, I found pg_getaddrinfo_all() being called from
libpq::connectDBStart(), which makes it not thread-safe. I am not
excited about backpatching it but it is a threading bug.
The output is as expected:
$ psql -h localhost test
psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "localhost" (127.0.0.1) and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432?
$ psql -h 127.0.0.1 test
psql: could not connect to server: Connection refused
Is the server running on host "127.0.0.1" and accepting
TCP/IP connections on port 5432?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/pgpatches/libpq_ipv6_v4 | text/x-diff | 34.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2010-11-20 23:21:48 | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-11-20 21:19:28 | Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE? |