From: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Eric Davies <eric(at)barrodale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival? |
Date: | 2010-11-05 12:57:56 |
Message-ID: | 20101105215755.50AD.6989961C@metrosystems.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 16:27:49 +0900
Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Shigeru HANADA
> <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> >> > * am_beginscan() -> first call of FdwRoutine.Iterate()?
> >> It might be good to have a separated "beginscan" method if we use
> >> asynchronous scans in multiple foreign servers in one query
> >
> > You mean that separated beginscan (FdwRoutine.BeginScan?) starts
> > asynchronous query and returns immediately, and FdwRoutine.Iterate
> > returns result of that query?
>
> Yes. Each BeginScan() in the executor node tree will be called at
> the beginning of executor's run. The callback should not block
> the caller. OTOH, Iterate() are called at the first time tuples
> in the node are required.
Thanks, now I see your point. Current FdwRoutine has no appropriate
function because Open is called from ExecutorStart which is used by
EXPLAIN too.
But then we have mismatch between executor node interface and FDW
interface about BeginScan. Should we add new function such as
ExecBeginNode and call ExecBeginXXX for each plan node?
New Query Processing Control Flow would be:
# based on README of executor directory
CreateQueryDesc
ExecutorStart
CreateExecutorState
creates per-query context
switch to per-query context to run ExecInitNode
ExecInitNode --- recursively scans plan tree
CreateExprContext
creates per-tuple context
ExecInitExpr
ExecutorRun
ExecBeginNode(new) --- recursively scans plan tree
call ExecBeginXXXS for each plan node
ExecProcNode --- recursively called in per-query context
ExecEvalExpr --- called in per-tuple context
ResetExprContext --- to free memory
ExecutorEnd
ExecEndNode --- recursively releases resources
FreeExecutorState
frees per-query context and child contexts
FreeQueryDesc
> PL/Proxy has a similar functionality with RUN ON ALL to start queries
> in parallel. So, I think it's a infrastructure commonly required.
I noticed the lack of consideration about cache invalidation from
reading PL/Proxy source, thanks for your mention about PL/Proxy. :-)
Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-05 14:43:45 | Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival? |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-11-05 09:49:34 | Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name |