From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why so many xlogs? |
Date: | 2010-11-01 19:20:32 |
Message-ID: | 20101101192032.GA18885@depesz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 08:13:49PM +0100, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> 2010/11/1 hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 07:22:50PM +0100, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> >> > as I understand, max number of xlog files in pg_xlog should be ( 1 + 2 *
> >> > checkpoint_segments ).
> >> (2 + checkpoint_completion_target) * checkpoint_segments + 1
> >> => 291
> >
> > this is formula gave to me by rhodiumtoad on irc, but we tested with lower
> > checkpoint_completion_target and it didn't change *anything*.
>
> You'll have between 211 and 291 files for 0.1 to 0.9
> checkpoint_completion_target.
> You'd have more than the number of files given by formula used during
> your tests ?
yes. we decreased checkpoint_completion_target to 0.5, and the numbers
of xlog segments *did not change*.
also - can you explain why "fraction of total time" (time!) would
directly relate to number of xlog files existing in pg_xlog? I mean -
you're not the first person to suggest it, but I don't see any way that
these two could be related.
Best regards,
depesz
--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz(at)depesz(dot)com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2010-11-01 19:21:21 | Re: Why so many xlogs? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2010-11-01 19:19:15 | Re: 8.4 Data Not Compatible with 9.0.1 Upgrade? |