| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is LISTEN/NOTIFY reliable? |
| Date: | 2010-10-17 01:25:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20101017.102523.1151864885595931898.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> Does anybody know PostgreSQL LISTEN/NOTIFY is more reliable than
>> previous versions? ,A I vaguely recall that in the previous
>> implementation, message sent by NOTIFY may not be reached to listner.
>> Does PostgreSQL 9.0's new implementation guarantee that the message is
>> received by the listener?
>
> I think it was always intended to be reliable (otherwise it's not much
> good). I think I remember a bug where notifications were being lost
> on Windows under heavy load, but I thought we fixed that...
Thanks. Maybe I was confused by the bug.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-17 01:25:34 | Re: knngist - 0.8 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-16 22:59:40 | Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific |