From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: security label support, revised |
Date: | 2010-10-13 03:59:19 |
Message-ID: | 201010130359.o9D3xJP12849@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Shigeru HANADA
> <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:07:33 -0400
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I found and fixed a few more issues and committed this. ?The pg_dump
> >> support had a few escaping bugs, and I added tab completion support
> >> for psql. ?Considering the size of the patch, it seems likely that
> >> there are some issues we both overlooked, but this is as solid as I
> >> can make it for right now.
> > Some OIDs used in SECURITY LABEL patch have already been used for
> > some functions such as pg_stat_get_xact_numscans().
> >
> > The src/include/catalog/duplicate_oids script reports that 3037 ~
> > 3040 are used two or more times.
> >
> > Though all regression tests finish successfully, should this be
> > fixed ?
>
> Woops. Thanks for the report, fixed. I wish we had a regression test
> that would catch these mistakes. It's easy to forget to run this
> script.
Attached it the script I use for checks that eventually calls
src/tools/pgtest.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 1.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-10-13 04:43:57 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-10-13 02:45:30 | Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege |