| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: leaky views, yet again |
| Date: | 2010-10-07 13:27:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20101007132731.GS26232@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > This might be overly pedantic, but I don't think 'tampering' gives the
> > right impression.
>
> I'm open to suggestions.
Yeah, wasn't coming up with a better word myself. :/ Maybe something
with "circumvented"?
> > Also, even if you can't create functions (due to lack of create
> > privileges on any schema), you could use DO clauses now. Revoking
> > usage rights on all languages should prevent both though.
>
> I don't see how to make it work with a DO clause.
Yeah, Heikki pointed out that I was assuming PG could work more magic
than it can today. :) Sorry for the noise.
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-07 13:30:56 | Re: On Scalability |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-07 13:23:27 | Re: leaky views, yet again |