Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:03:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I mean, it took us forever to require Perl 5.8.
>
> ... and we still make a point of not having a hard requirement for
> that. If you don't want plperl, you can build from a tarball with
> no perl at all.
>
> Given the project history, I can't see us turning a dependency we
> just added this week into a hard requirement anytime soon.
>
> Now having said that, if you define "supported platform" to mean
> "gets tested on the buildfarm", we do require Perl. And CVS, which
> will soon get replaced by a requirement for Git. But I'm not going
> to tell someone to get lost if they file a portability bug report
> without having set up a buildfarm animal first.

I agree that "get lost" is not a reasonable first reaction, but as
with platforms like AIX, "It would help us enormously for you to put
up a buildfarm animal with your development environment on it" isn't.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate