| From: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 20:22:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20100922202216.GX17152@aart.is.rice.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:17:54PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> While it's interesting to note, in an historical sense, that a
> platform most recently updated when 1999 was still in the future, I
> think it's time we did a little pruning.
>
> We can start by supporting only platforms git runs on, this being the
> first in what I'd picture as a set of base requirements.
>
> What say?
>
> Cheers,
> David.
Given the amount of trouble I had to get a git for a Solaris 8
system, I am not too keen on this definition for platform. PostgreSQL
runs very well on the same system, along with SVN and CVS.
Cheers,
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-09-22 20:25:01 | Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-09-22 20:20:19 | Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms |