From: | "Joshua J(dot) Kugler" <joshua(at)eeinternet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: versioned pl/pgsql functions |
Date: | 2010-09-21 23:28:07 |
Message-ID: | 201009211528.07761.joshua@eeinternet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 21 September 2010, Dmitriy Igrishin elucidated thus:
> Hey all,
>
> After ten years with stored procedures I am thinking so this is not
>
> > too well technique. Much better is writing stored procedures to a
> > file and using usual tools for file's versioning. We did some tools
> > for storing a versions inside database, but still we prefer a
> > standard developer tools - vi or emacs like editor and plain text.
> > The main problem of procedures maintained inside database is loss
> > of outer formatting and outer comments. And you cannot to group
> > procedures to modules. On the other hand - some history can be
> > useful for all database objects - not only for stored procedures.
>
> Agree with Pavel.
At the danger of sounding like a "me too:"
Agree with Pavel.
Keep version control in version control. Make creation/replacement of
stored procedures part of your deployment system.
j
--
Joshua Kugler
Part-Time System Admin/Programmer
http://www.eeinternet.com - Fairbanks, AK
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ ID 0x73B13B6A
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bret Green | 2010-09-22 00:24:32 | macro/inline table valued functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 22:50:43 | Re: Memory Errors |