| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Kramer <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: News coverage, link it here |
| Date: | 2010-09-20 20:03:38 |
| Message-ID: | 201009202003.o8KK3cD29674@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua Kramer wrote:
>
> On this thread,
>
> > Quotation:
> >
> > "The new 9.0 version has many features that put it on parity and
> > even surpass some of the MySQL functionality."
> >
> > Oh well. It doesn't look like our message really came across very well
> > in that particular article.
>
> Please suggest how I can improve this passage in my Linux Journal article:
>
> Postgres has always been valued in applications where data integrity is of
> the utmost importance. Other open source database systems have been
> favored where there is a perceived . but not necessarily actual . ease of
> use advantage. Some of these .ease of use. objections have been raised in
> the areas of major version upgrades, replication, and security
> configuration. With version 9, Postgres has improved in all of these
> areas.
I like that. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-09-20 20:14:56 | Re: News coverage, link it here |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-09-20 20:02:19 | Re: News coverage, link it here |