| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: git diff --patience |
| Date: | 2010-09-16 22:32:17 |
| Message-ID: | 201009162232.o8GMWHK04117@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> I just discovered the --patience flag on the git diff command, and
> I'd like to suggest that we encourage people to use it when possible
> for building patches. I just looked at output with and without it
> (and for good measure, before and after filterdiff --format=context
> for both), and the results were much better with this switch.
>
> Here's a reference to the algorithm:
>
> http://bramcohen.livejournal.com/73318.html
>
> I think that page understates the benefits, though.
I have seen the bracket example shown and the --patience output is
clearly nicer.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-09-16 22:35:10 | Re: Serializable Snapshot Isolation |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2010-09-16 21:52:15 | Re: can we publish a aset interface? |