From: | tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: git: uh-oh |
Date: | 2010-08-28 07:02:37 |
Message-ID: | 20100828070237.GB8331@tomas |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:35:53PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
[...]
> > I must say, it is refreshing to have users who actually care about their
> > conversion, as opposed to the usual rabble who think that git-cvsimport
> > is Just Fine :-) I guess if the postgresql project didn't care about
> > data integrity then we would all have to worry :-)
>
> I laughed when I read this - yeah, we're kind of paranoid about that.
Going a bit off-topic -- although I'm extremely strapped on time I have
been following this thread with attention. The above reminds me why I
appreciate git; it's not just the technical parts, but the culture
behind it what convince me.
Thanks for a very interesting thread
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMeLSNBcgs9XrR2kYRAoTUAJ9AnpqkVID3YO1l3RhwU1rRMMtIIwCfR9yW
T4NsNX5Ju5BZQhbxIEmDIpg=
=+u0H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2010-08-28 09:48:01 | Re: refactoring comment.c |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-28 02:42:12 | Re: refactoring comment.c |