From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item |
Date: | 2010-08-24 18:08:58 |
Message-ID: | 201008241808.o7OI8x505603@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> I've been looking at the open item which belongs with this doc:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/backup-incremental-updated.html
>
> ... and my viewpoint is that the procedure described should be *cut*
> from the official docs and put on the Wiki, with warnings. It's simply
> far too hackish and dependant on DBA understanding of PostgreSQL
> internals to belong in the main docs.
>
> In 9.1 we'll probably have some machinery to make taking snapshots of
> the standby more reliable (like running pg_start_backup on the master),
> and then that procedure will belong in the main docs.
FYI, I am working on a doc update that will use pg_start/stop backup on
the master, as suggested by Fujii Masao:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-08/msg00237.php
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-08-24 18:23:28 | Re: EXPLAIN doesn't show the actual function expression for FunctionScan |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-08-24 18:04:52 | Backups from the standby (Incrementally Updated Backups), open item |