Re: Massively Parallel transactioning?

From: Benjamin Smith <lists(at)benjamindsmith(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Massively Parallel transactioning?
Date: 2010-08-19 18:19:16
Message-ID: 201008191119.16320.lists@benjamindsmith.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday, August 18, 2010 04:58:08 pm Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Well if you are just using it for updates to the schema etc... you
> should only need to launch a single connection to each database to make
> those changes.

And that's exactly the problem. On each server, we have at least dozens of
active databases - one for each client. Opening a connection for each database
starts to become problematic.

This problem is now solved with prepared transactions.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Brunza 2010-08-19 18:25:00 ip contained within subnet
Previous Message Benjamin Smith 2010-08-19 18:13:04 Re: Massively Parallel transactioning?