Re: return setof : alternatives to holder table

From: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: return setof : alternatives to holder table
Date: 2010-08-15 10:20:02
Message-ID: 20100815102002.GA31040@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In response to zhong ming wu :
> Hello List,
>
> I have a plpgsql function returning a set of records. The record is
> effectively a join of some tables.
>
> For example, table a (column a1,column a2,column a3,column a4)
>
> table b(column b1,column b2,column b4)
>
> I am returning a set of (a2,a4,b2). What I do now is to create a empty table
>
> foo(column a2,column a4,column b2)
>
> then in my function I have
>
> record r foo%rowtype
>
> I'm not happy with this solution because this foo tables has to be kept around
>
> Thanks for any better solution to this

You can create a aown typ or you can use IN/OUT-Parameters. I'm
prefering IN/OUT-Parameters, see here:

http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/archives/129-Use-of-OUT-and-INOUT-Parameters.html
http://bytes.com/topic/postgresql/answers/674690-output-parameters-functions

Regards, Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG: 0x31720C99, 1006 CCB4 A326 1D42 6431 2EB0 389D 1DC2 3172 0C99

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2010-08-15 11:57:56 Re: return setof : alternatives to holder table
Previous Message Mike Christensen 2010-08-15 10:18:31 Re: return setof : alternatives to holder table